Elementymology & Elements Multidict |
The systematic names for the new discovered elements are derived from their atomic numbers. Each digit is converted into a word based on Latin and Greek words for the number, at the end a suffix is added.
digit & syllable | derivation | Russian | other variants |
---|---|---|---|
0 = nil | Latin nihil = nothing | нил | |
1 = un | Latin unus = one | ун | ūn Latvian |
2 = bi | Latin bis = two as adverb | би | |
3 = tri | Latin tres = three | три | terc Croatian§ |
4 = quad | Latin quattuor = four | квад | kvad Croatian, Esperanto, Latvian cuad Spanish (also quad) |
5 = pent | Greek pente = five | пент | |
6 = hex | Greek ex = six | хекс | heks Croatian, Latvian, Norwegian |
7 = sept | Latin septem = seven | септ | |
8 = oct | Latin octo = eight | окт | okt Croatian, Latvian |
9 = en* | Greek ennea = nine... | ен | |
Suffix = -ium** | usual for elements | -ий | -io Italian, Portuguese, Spanish -иjум Serbian -ij Croatian -ijs Latvian |
Example element 116: 1 + 1 + 6 = un + un + hex + ium = ununhexium, symbol Uuh; element 130 will be untrinilium, symbol Utn.
Naming the transfermium elements
The Transfermium Working Group was established in 1986 by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). The working group published several reports, and then recommended that elements should not be named after living persons. This greatly upset the USA - who wanted to name an element after Glenn T. Seaborg. In 1994 a IUPAC recommendation was made (names marked (1) in the table below). As a result of the criticisms on these names, the commission reconsidered the names at a meeting in August 1996.
"After some discussion CNIC [= IUPAC Commission on Nomenclature in Inorganic Chemistry] agreed that elements 101, 102 and 103 should retain their commonly accepted names mendelevium, nobelium, and lawrencium. This is despite the fact that the original Swedish claim to have prepared element 102 was subsequently shown to have been in error by the Dubna laboratory, which finally achieved an undisputed synthesis. The adjudicate on competing claims for priority of discovery. |
(1) IUPAC 1994 recommendations (on-line PDF). (2) American Chemical Society 1994 Proposal. (3) Proposal by the Îáúåäèíåííûé Èíñòèòóò ßäåðíûõ Èññëåäîâàíèé (ÎÈßÈ) - Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) at Äóáíà (Dubna), Russia. (4) Proposal (1992) by Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany. (5) Commission on the Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, Recommendations for the Naming of Elements of Atomic Numbers Greater than 100 (Rules Approved 1978). (on-line) |
Further reading:
© Peter van der Krogt